- Addressing the cost of living
- Quality Improvement Program
- Australian Service Excellence Standards (ASES)
- Concessions and Support Services
- Exceptional Needs Unit
- Grants for organisations
- Interpreting and Translating Centre
- LGBTIQ Inclusion
- Local Partnerships
- Metropolitan Aboriginal Youth and Family Services
- Results-Based Accountability
- STARservice Development Program
- Community Connections
Throughout the consultation process, a number of key themes emerged:
Providers advised that the HACC program currently supports people facing a range of complex and interrelated issues and who face heightened vulnerability because they are socially isolated.
Social isolation and disconnection (28.9%) was rated the highest risk factor for clients in the provider survey and discussions, followed by mental health issues (24.8%), chronic illness (16.8%), poverty/unemployment (12.1%), and low level/episodic disability (6%).
Many services and programs address a particular need (i.e. focusing on specific cohorts) and overlook the underlying issue which is that people are seeking assistance in the first instance because they are isolated from support and have no pathways into the community.
Peak organisations highlighted the need for outreach service models to identify and support people who are socially isolated. It was emphasised that this approach requires dedicated staff or volunteers who are highly skilled at engaging, listening and supporting others to build their capacity.
Social isolation arises because individuals do not have a social network to connect with or seek help from.
It was reported that there is a continuing service gap for people who are not eligible for or unable to access other systems, such as NDIS or aged care support.
Support through the My Aged Care system is only available to people aged over 65 whereas nearly 60% of HACC clients are aged between 55-64, with 35% on the cusp of eligibility for My Aged Care.
For people aged under 65 with a functional disability, providers advised of the barriers and challenges associated with accessing the NDIS. In one-on-one consultation meetings:
- 42% of providers indicated that system complexity was a barrier to clients accessing the NDIS;
- 33% of providers indicated the NDIS was unsuitable for their clients, particularly for clients living with mental health issues; and
- 25% cited the episodic nature of a client’s disability as the reason for ineligibility.
Providers reported a lack of government-funded services, particularly in regional and remote areas, for clients who are ineligible for NDIS. It was noted that sometimes no suitable alternative services exist, and where they do, they are often at maximum capacity.
Due to this gap, 57% of providers indicated there is a sustained demand for the services they provide under the HACC program. However, 31% did note some success in transitioning clients to the NDIS or My Aged Care, and 12% did not provide comment on this.
Providers advised there is currently an overemphasis on service outputs rather than client outcomes. As HACC providers are currently required to report primarily in terms of the hours or number of services delivered by unit, providers expressed the need to measure the short- and long-term outcomes achieved for their clients, e.g. quality of life/wellbeing.
HACC providers are each currently contracted to deliver a set of distinct service types which restricts the ability to flexibly tailor services to each client. Providers advised of the need to design supports that are person-centric and responsive to clients’ individual needs, preferences and circumstances, and of how critical this flexibility has been in responding effectively to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Integration and collaboration
[There is a] need for better understanding of who other Providers in region are to develop network of support and work together.
Analysis of service data indicated that in early 2020, 25% of HACC providers had less than 20 clients and 70% of providers supported under 100 clients. Providers are contracted for different services and are often unaware of what other providers offer, indicating minimal integration across the program.
Peak organisations stressed the importance of an integrated system with a ‘no wrong door’ approach, particularly for clients with high and complex needs.
Providers emphasised the need for community development approaches based on collaboration, such as by working closely with local community centres (e.g. utilising space for events), working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander/culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) leaders, holding cultural events, connecting to churches, schools and community organisations. This was echoed by peak organisations who highlighted the importance of a place-based focus involving collaboration across a range of community organisations within a region.
Providers reported the highly valued role unpaid carers play in providing direct support to vulnerable people within a stretched system, as well as their unique barriers and potential service gaps:
- Carers are often socially isolated, have health issues themselves, and receive minimal income;
- Carers face unique challenges in rural and regional areas, including high rates of suicide and mental health issues, and low rates of help-seeking; and
- The recent roll-out of the federal Carers Gateway and RDP has presented a number of challenges, including:
- Limited support and advocacy to help carers access an unfamiliar system and overcome barriers such as digital literacy;
- A need for local, known and trusted organisations within the community; and
- A need for support to develop the capacity for connection with other carers, such as through peer support networks, and to target specific groups like young carers.
Providers advised of the crucial role volunteers play in the delivery of the HACC program by assisting in the delivery of transport and social support services (e.g. taking people shopping). 73% of survey respondents indicated that they engage with volunteers in support of this program. Peak organisations suggested community organisations should focus on building the organisational capacity and procedures to encourage and support volunteers.
Providers reported difficulty in meeting the emerging needs of younger people within the parameters of the current service model. Peak organisations highlighted young people as a primary intervention point for preventative support and noted that this cohort has been particularly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and may continue to be impacted by the resulting economic recession.
Culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) and new and emerging communities (NEC)
Providers and peaks reported on the need for flexibility to support the diverse needs of multicultural communities. Emphasis was placed on the importance of multicultural or culturally-specific services that support wellbeing, independence and quality of life for CALD and NEC clients. For example, client care coordination was noted as particularly important as language can serve as an additional barrier to navigating an already complex service system.
Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander communities
Peak organisations emphasised that supports for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people need to be embedded in the community as current staff are trusted, connected to people, and able to identify emerging issues and needs, which are constantly changing.
Both providers and peak organisations highlighted the unique issues faced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities including the higher cost of delivering services in remote communities, a high reliance on transport services due to many Aboriginal elders not having access to transport, an earlier average onset of chronic health issues, and concerns around elder abuse.Page last updated : 09 Nov 2020